Although scholars often relate to intersectionality as a theory, 4 it is really not the type of concept with which many scientists that are social familiar. That is, intersectionality doesn’t have core elements or variables become operationalized and empirically tested. Because of this, we prevent the term concept in support of terms such as for example theoretical framework or perspective that denote intersectionality much a lot more of a analytical framework or paradigm than a normal theory that is testable. Certainly, intersectionality departs from traditional biomedical, biobehavioral, and psychosocial paradigms which have shaped medicine, general general general public wellness, therefore the other social sciences in a number of key methods. A thorough conversation of those distinctions is beyond the scope of the article. Alternatively, We refer visitors to Weber and Parra-Medina’s15 chapter that is excellent intersectionality and women’s wellness by which they elucidate the distinctions between your old-fashioned biomedical, biobehavioral, and psychosocial paradigms and intersectionality.
We look at the core principles of intersectionality many strongly related health that is public be the following: (1) social identities aren’t separate and unidimensional but numerous and intersecting, (2) folks from multiple historically oppressed and marginalized teams are the focal or kick off point, and (3) multiple social identities during the micro degree (in other words., intersections of race, gender, and SES) intersect with macrolevel structural facets (i.e., poverty, racism, and sexism) to illustrate or create disparate wellness results. Continue reading